Opposing it means he hopes the Supreme Court will allow forcible divorce of his gay constituents. Which is better, Scott? Which wars against which constituents do you want to fight?
I appreciate your writing. Thank you. I’ve followed Rep Franklin’s record in Congress since he was elected. I’m gobsmacked over his infinitesimal, or perhaps nonexistent, achievements. On his congressional email list, I have only seen bills he’s either sponsored or co-sponsored about increasing access to firearms. That’s it! I’ve never seen a thing reported that might actually serve our community. I don’t understand the point of spending your own money to get elected, go back and forth to DC, to truly accomplish nothing. I guess it’s just a vanity project.
Like you, I would be excited to see our representative stand up for human rights, such as the right to marriage and certainly a vote against forced divorce. It’s hard to imagine him doing this. I assume he will vote along with his wingman.
I appreciate your writing. Thank you. I’ve followed Rep Franklin’s record in Congress since he was elected. I’m gobsmacked over his infinitesimal, or perhaps nonexistent, achievements. On his congressional email list, I have only seen bills he’s either sponsored or co-sponsored about increasing access to firearms. That’s it! I’ve never seen a thing reported that might actually serve our community. I don’t understand the point of spending your own money to get elected, go back and forth to DC, to truly accomplish nothing. I guess it’s just a vanity project.
Like you, I would be excited to see our representative stand up for human rights, such as the right to marriage and certainly a vote against forced divorce. It’s hard to imagine him doing this. I assume he will vote along with his wingman.
I live to destroy assumptions. You’re prolly right. It we’ve just made it harder