Sheriff Showtime is about to spend up to $5M of your money on something built to surveil you. And the County Commission has buried it deeeeeep in its consent agenda. Nice job, George, Neil, etc. LOL.
Is your position that you’re expressing here that there are no legitimate law enforcement purposes for this aircraft? Or that you don’t trust Grady and Polk County LE to use this technology responsibly?
Why don't read the headline and the piece and tell my position. I stated it clearly several times. I asked two things of commissioners. Why don't you tell me what they are?
I will say here that I do not really trust a sheriff who invented a riot that didn't exist, hunted down a bouncy-panty tosser on felony charges, campaigns in uniform, indulges white supremacist hoaxes and surrounds himself with a Praetorian Guard of depuites everywhere he goes with *any* technology or authority. But that's not the point of the piece, as the piece makes clear. We don't even know what they plane r imaging system is.
Grady is evil. He told me that he would pepper spray mothers who protested against the experimental vaccine. He has refused to help me stop the government abusing me for exposing trafficking and medical fraud to cover up trafficking in CPS, he refuses to tell people what type of cameras he is using saying it's none of our business, now this plane. Like I need anymore anxiety about the sheriff hunting us down in the woods as we hide from the next round of forced vaccines under sb2006.381.00315
This man is a psychopath and his cult like following creeps me out - I am very thankful to find your post to see at least one person who isn't bending over.
All these people claim legitimate uses... That doesn't mean they shouldn't be questioned every step of the way in terms of their commitment to C40 cities and communist control.
I mean, you ask what it’s for. But I don’t think it takes much imagination to me to think of legitimate uses. Tracking down hit and run perpetrators for one, or home burglary suspects. My understanding of these systems are that they are mainly passive surveillance so that if a crime takes place in public spaces there are records of it that can used for investigation.
I believe that you do have the capacity to consider these purposes (and more), so I’m trying to understand what your real problem is with this. I guess to most relevant question to me is “What are the laws and policies that govern the use of a tool like this?”
I don't trust the police to use any technology responsibility, especially not one that pushes experimental drugs on people in violation of their civil rights
Is your position that you’re expressing here that there are no legitimate law enforcement purposes for this aircraft? Or that you don’t trust Grady and Polk County LE to use this technology responsibly?
Why don't read the headline and the piece and tell my position. I stated it clearly several times. I asked two things of commissioners. Why don't you tell me what they are?
I will say here that I do not really trust a sheriff who invented a riot that didn't exist, hunted down a bouncy-panty tosser on felony charges, campaigns in uniform, indulges white supremacist hoaxes and surrounds himself with a Praetorian Guard of depuites everywhere he goes with *any* technology or authority. But that's not the point of the piece, as the piece makes clear. We don't even know what they plane r imaging system is.
Grady is evil. He told me that he would pepper spray mothers who protested against the experimental vaccine. He has refused to help me stop the government abusing me for exposing trafficking and medical fraud to cover up trafficking in CPS, he refuses to tell people what type of cameras he is using saying it's none of our business, now this plane. Like I need anymore anxiety about the sheriff hunting us down in the woods as we hide from the next round of forced vaccines under sb2006.381.00315
This man is a psychopath and his cult like following creeps me out - I am very thankful to find your post to see at least one person who isn't bending over.
All these people claim legitimate uses... That doesn't mean they shouldn't be questioned every step of the way in terms of their commitment to C40 cities and communist control.
I mean, you ask what it’s for. But I don’t think it takes much imagination to me to think of legitimate uses. Tracking down hit and run perpetrators for one, or home burglary suspects. My understanding of these systems are that they are mainly passive surveillance so that if a crime takes place in public spaces there are records of it that can used for investigation.
I believe that you do have the capacity to consider these purposes (and more), so I’m trying to understand what your real problem is with this. I guess to most relevant question to me is “What are the laws and policies that govern the use of a tool like this?”
Sure. This is not a thing I am arguing. Why don't you quote me to tell me what I'm arguing. Lol "Passive" meaning total?
Is it your position that this $5M purchase should be approved on consent without discussion in the formal public meeting on Tuesday?
Not at all. It merits serious discussion. But I wouldn’t dismiss that it could be a legitimate resource (which is what your post is implying.)
I don't trust the police to use any technology responsibility, especially not one that pushes experimental drugs on people in violation of their civil rights